Ordering Desires
The goal is not to eliminate desire but to ORDER it toward God. John of the Cross: the problem is not that you desire too much, but that you desire the wrong things — or the right things in the wro...
The goal is not to eliminate desire but to ORDER it toward God. John of the Cross: the problem is not that you desire too much, but that you desire the wrong things — or the right things in the wrong way. Food, rest, friendship, beauty — all good gifts from God. They become disordered when they become ultimate — when you NEED them more than you need God. (Ep 643, 644)
The goal is not to eliminate desire but to ORDER it toward God. John of the Cross: the problem is not that you desire too much, but that you desire the wrong things — or the right things in the wrong way. Food, rest, friendship, beauty — all good gifts from God. They become disordered when they become ultimate — when you NEED them more than you need God. (Ep 643, 644)
To appreciate the full significance of this teaching, it helps to situate it within the broader framework of the Catholic spiritual tradition. The great masters of the interior life — Teresa of Avila, John of the Cross, Francis de Sales, and Ignatius of Loyola — each brought their distinctive charism and experience to bear on questions like this one. Their convergent testimony, spanning centuries and diverse vocations, gives this teaching a depth and authority that goes far beyond any single author's perspective.
Understanding "ordering desires" requires attending to both its doctrinal foundations and its practical implications. The Catholic tradition insists that authentic spiritual knowledge is never merely theoretical — it must be tested in prayer, refined through experience, and ultimately verified by its fruits in the life of the soul. This is why the Church's greatest teachers on the spiritual life are not only theologians but saints — men and women who lived what they taught, and whose writings carry the authority of verified experience.
At the same time, the tradition is careful to anchor experiential testimony in sound doctrine. The Doctors of the Church do not simply report their own experiences; they interpret those experiences in light of Scripture, the Fathers, and the Church's magisterial teaching. This integration of experience and doctrine is one of the defining characteristics of Catholic spiritual theology, and it is what gives the tradition its remarkable combination of depth and reliability.
The richness of the tradition becomes apparent when we listen to the voices of the masters themselves. Each brings a distinctive perspective to this teaching, yet all converge on its essential truth.
St. Thomas Aquinas writes:
Or again according to Chrysostom [*Hom. xvii in Matth. in the Opus Imperfectum falsely ascribed to St. John of the Cross], He forbids the judgment which proceeds not from benevolence but from bitterness of heart. Reply to Objection 2: A judge is appointed as God's servant; wherefore it is written.
(Source: summa_english.txt)
St. Teresa of Avila writes:
Fray Antonio nevertheless persevered, and bore all contradiction in peace, and ‘the persecution of evil tongues ’ (ch. ii. 15) never shook his good resolution. The other friar was Fray Juan of S. Mathias, afterwards and now known as S. John of the Cross. He had been received into the order in the. house of S. Anne in Medina del Campo in the year 1563, when he was about twenty-one years of age,.
(Source: book_of_foundations.txt)
St. Francis de Sales writes:
SPIRITUAL FLOWERS A soul dedicated to God entirely, in act and in will, deserves that God should give Himself entirely to her—St. John of the Cross. We ought always to have our eye fixed upon the Will of God alone, recognising it, and with all joy, or at least courage, following it carefully in all our actions.
(Source: 06_selected_letters.txt)
St. Ignatius of Loyola writes:
Father de Guibert^s fine phrase his was a mysticism of service, and no one can read his letters without being struck by the complete absence of that mystical language which only a few years later St. Teresa and St. John of the Cross were to make so familiar. His sights were focused on the praise and reverence of His Divine Majesty, and this he beheld with a clearness and sought with a consistency.
(Source: letters_young_1959_NOTE_may_be_copyrighted.txt)
The Catechism (PD) writes:
The sixteenth and seventeenth centuries were also illustrated by St.
(Source: deharbe_catechism.txt)
St. Thomas Aquinas writes:
4:5, "Judge not before the time." Therefore a judgment based on suspicion would seem not to be unlawful. On the contrary, Chrysostom [*Hom. xvii in Matth. in the Opus Imperfectum falsely ascribed to St. John of the Cross] in comment on the words of Mat. 7:1, "Judge not," etc., says: "By this commandment our Lord does not forbid Christians to reprove others from kindly motives, but that Christian.
(Source: summa_english.txt)
St. Teresa of Avila writes:
Andrew. This is the date given in the depositions in the process of beatification of S. John of the Cross at Medina (/éid. p. 47, note). Father Gerardo suggests that the 28th may have been the date of the arrival of Antonio de.
(Source: book_of_foundations.txt)
The Church's doctrinal tradition provides authoritative grounding for this teaching. Proposition T2.O.006 (sententia_certa) states:
The consequences of original sin in each person include a darkened intellect, a weakened will inclined to evil, disordered concupiscence, subjection to suffering and bodily death, and a general diminishment of the natural powers — though free will itself is not destroyed.
- Scripture: ['For I am delighted with the law of God, according to the inward man: but I see another law in my members, fighting against the law of my mind, and...
- Aquinas: ['Through the sin of our first parent, his descendants are deprived of grace, and the powers of the soul are left in a manner weakened and...
- Councils: ["If anyone says that since Adam's sin the free will of man is lost and extinguished... let him be anathema.", "If anyone says that the whole man,...
- Fathers: ['By the greatness of the first transgression, our nature had fallen and deteriorated, and was changed for the worse... Not that free will was...
Additionally, proposition T4.G.005 (de_fide) affirms: The grace of justification can be lost through mortal sin. The justified person is not assured of final perseverance without a special privilege of God.
For the engaged learner, understanding "ordering desires" opens a path to deeper prayer and more fruitful cooperation with grace. The sources cited above show that this is not abstract theology but a lived reality that has shaped the spiritual lives of countless saints and ordinary Christians across two millennia.
The practical challenge is to take this teaching into one's own prayer and daily life. This might begin with reflective reading of one or more of the sources quoted above, followed by prayerful consideration of how this teaching applies to one's current spiritual situation. The tradition consistently emphasises that spiritual growth comes not from accumulating information but from allowing truth to penetrate the heart through prayer, sacramental life, and faithful practice.
As St. Francis de Sales reminds us, the devout life is possible in every state — what matters is not extraordinary circumstances but extraordinary love applied to ordinary duties. This teaching invites precisely that kind of response: a deepening of one's relationship with God through understanding and practice, sustained by the rich resources of the tradition.
The goal is not to eliminate desire but to ORDER it toward God. John of the Cross: the problem is not that you desire too much, but that you desire the wrong things — or the right things in the wrong way. Food, rest, friendship, beauty — all good gifts from God. They become disordered when they become ultimate — when you NEED them more than you need God. (Ep 643, 644)
Doctrinal Foundation
T2.O.006 (sententia_certa): The consequences of original sin in each person include a darkened intellect, a weakened will inclined to evil, disordered concupiscence, subjection to suffering and bodily death, and a general diminishment of the natural powers — though free will itself is not destroyed.
- Aquinas: Through the sin of our first parent, his descendants are deprived of grace, and the powers of the soul are left in a manner weakened and disordered, which weakening is called a wounding of nature.
- Councils: If anyone says that since Adam's sin the free will of man is lost and extinguished... let him be anathema.
- Fathers: By the greatness of the first transgression, our nature had fallen and deteriorated, and was changed for the worse... Not that free will was altogether taken away, but that it was weakened and bent.
T4.G.005 (De fide (defined dogma)): The grace of justification can be lost through mortal sin. The justified person is not assured of final perseverance without a special privilege of God.
- Scripture: Wherefore he that thinketh himself to stand, let him take heed lest he fall.
Aquinas: Free-will does not suffice for the act of turning to God without the habitual gift of grace. But after grace is received, the act of perseverance still needs the help of grace.
Fathers: He who made thee without thee, will not justify thee without thee.
T4.G.007 (De fide (defined dogma)): God gives sufficient grace to all the just for the observance of the divine commandments. God does not command the impossible, but by commanding admonishes us to do what we can and to pray for what we cannot.
- Scripture: God is faithful, who will not suffer you to be tempted above that which you are able: but will make also with temptation issue, that you may be able to bear it.
- Aquinas: To him who does what is in him, God does not deny grace.
- Councils: God does not command impossibilities, but by commanding admonishes thee to do what thou canst, and to pray for what thou canst not, and aids thee that thou mayest be able.
- Fathers: Give what Thou commandest, and command what Thou wilt.
The goal is not to eliminate desire but to ORDER it toward God. John of the Cross: the problem is not that you desire too much, but that you desire the wrong things — or the right things in the wrong way. Food, rest, friendship, beauty — all good gifts from God. They become disordered when they become ultimate — when you NEED them more than you need God. (Ep 643, 644)
Doctrinal Foundation
T2.O.006 (sententia_certa): The consequences of original sin in each person include a darkened intellect, a weakened will inclined to evil, disordered concupiscence, subjection to suffering and bodily death, and a general diminishment of the natural powers — though free will itself is not destroyed.
- Aquinas: Through the sin of our first parent, his descendants are deprived of grace, and the powers of the soul are left in a manner weakened and disordered, which weakening is called a wounding of nature.
- Councils: If anyone says that since Adam's sin the free will of man is lost and extinguished... let him be anathema.
- Fathers: By the greatness of the first transgression, our nature had fallen and deteriorated, and was changed for the worse... Not that free will was altogether taken away, but that it was weakened and bent.
T4.G.005 (De fide (defined dogma)): The grace of justification can be lost through mortal sin. The justified person is not assured of final perseverance without a special privilege of God.
- Scripture: Wherefore he that thinketh himself to stand, let him take heed lest he fall.
Aquinas: Free-will does not suffice for the act of turning to God without the habitual gift of grace. But after grace is received, the act of perseverance still needs the help of grace.
Fathers: He who made thee without thee, will not justify thee without thee.
T4.G.007 (De fide (defined dogma)): God gives sufficient grace to all the just for the observance of the divine commandments. God does not command the impossible, but by commanding admonishes us to do what we can and to pray for what we cannot.
- Scripture: God is faithful, who will not suffer you to be tempted above that which you are able: but will make also with temptation issue, that you may be able to bear it.
- Aquinas: To him who does what is in him, God does not deny grace.
- Councils: God does not command impossibilities, but by commanding admonishes thee to do what thou canst, and to pray for what thou canst not, and aids thee that thou mayest be able.
- Fathers: Give what Thou commandest, and command what Thou wilt.
Extended Doctrinal Analysis
T4.G.016 (De fide (defined dogma)): Without a special divine revelation, no one can know with the certainty of faith whether he is in a state of sanctifying grace. A moral certitude grounded in signs of the spiritual life is possible, but absolute certitude of faith is not.
T4.G.025 (De fide (defined dogma)): The virtue of charity can be lost through mortal sin. When charity is lost, sanctifying grace is also lost, since charity is the form of grace. However, faith and hope may remain even after the loss of charity, unless they too are destroyed by sins directly opposed to them.
T4.G.034 (De fide (defined dogma)): The gift of final perseverance — the grace to die in the state of sanctifying grace — cannot be strictly merited but must be obtained by prayer. It is a great and special gift of God, and the Council of Trent teaches that the justified should place their firmest hope in God's help.
T4.S.030 (De fide (defined dogma)): Christ instituted the Sacrament of Penance for the reconciliation of the faithful who have fallen into sin after Baptism. Sacramental confession of mortal sins is necessary for salvation by divine law for all who have fallen after Baptism.
T4.S.031 (De fide (defined dogma)): The acts of the penitent — contrition, confession, and satisfaction — are the quasi-matter of the Sacrament of Penance. Perfect contrition, arising from the love of God, reconciles the sinner to God even before the actual reception of the sacrament, provided it includes the desire to confess.
T4.S.032 (De fide (defined dogma)): The minister of the Sacrament of Penance is a priest who holds jurisdiction (faculties) from the Church. No deacon or layperson can validly absolve sins.
T4.S.033 (De fide (defined dogma)): The absolution given by the priest in the Sacrament of Penance is a true judicial act, not merely a declaration or announcement that sins have been forgiven. The priest acts as judge, with the power to bind and to loose.
T4.S.034 (De fide (defined dogma)): The confession of all mortal sins according to their species and number, so far as they are remembered after diligent examination of conscience, is required by divine law and is necessary for salvation.
T4.S.035 (De fide (defined dogma)): Attrition — imperfect contrition arising from a consideration of the ugliness of sin or from the fear of hell and punishment — is a true and profitable sorrow. It suffices for the valid reception of the Sacrament of Penance, provided it excludes the will to sin and includes the hope of forgiveness.
T4.S.036 (sententia_certa): The sacramental seal of confession (sigillum confessionis) is inviolable. The priest may never, for any reason whatsoever, reveal anything that a penitent has confessed to him, whether by word, sign, or in any other manner.
T4.S.037 (De fide (defined dogma)): Satisfaction — the penance imposed by the confessor — is a true part of the Sacrament of Penance. Through works of satisfaction (prayer, fasting, almsgiving, and other pious works), the temporal punishment due to sins already forgiven as to guilt is remitted in whole or in part.
T4.S.038 (De fide (defined dogma)): The Church possesses the power to grant indulgences — a remission before God of the temporal punishment due to sins already forgiven as to their guilt. This power was granted by Christ and has been exercised by the Church from the earliest times. Indulgences draw upon the treasury of merit of Christ and the saints.
T4.S.039 (sententia_certa): The Sacrament of Penance can be received repeatedly and as often as a Christian falls into sin. Unlike the sacraments that imprint a character, Penance imposes no limit on the number of times it may be received, and the faithful are encouraged to confess frequently.
T4.S.091 (De fide (defined dogma)): An unworthy reception of the Eucharist — that is, receiving Holy Communion in the state of mortal sin with knowledge and deliberation — is a grave sacrilege. The communicant eats and drinks judgement to himself by failing to discern the Body of the Lord.