The Two Dogs
Dr. Anthony Lillis uses the parable of two dogs fighting inside you: one represents virtue and one represents vice.
Dr. Anthony Lillis uses the parable of two dogs fighting inside you: one represents virtue and one represents vice. "Which one wins? The one you feed." Every choice to indulge a disordered appetite feeds the bad dog; every choice for virtue feeds the good one. Your appetites (desires for comfort, pleasure, approval, control) are not evil in themselves — but they must be ordered toward God or they become chains. (Ep 643)
Dr. Anthony Lillis uses the parable of two dogs fighting inside you: one represents virtue and one represents vice. "Which one wins? The one you feed." Every choice to indulge a disordered appetite feeds the bad dog; every choice for virtue feeds the good one. Your appetites (desires for comfort, pleasure, approval, control) are not evil in themselves -- but they must be ordered toward God or they become chains. (Ep 643)
This parable captures in a single image what the entire Catholic ascetical tradition has taught for two millennia: the choices we make daily either strengthen virtue or strengthen vice. There is no neutral ground. Every small decision is feeding one of the two dogs. St. Paul describes this interior battle with striking honesty: "For I am delighted with the law of God, according to the inward man: but I see another law in my members, fighting against the law of my mind, and captivating me in the law of sin." The Apostle himself experienced the pull of two competing forces within him -- and he knew that the battle required constant vigilance and grace.
The theological foundation for this teaching is the doctrine of original sin and its consequences. As St. Thomas Aquinas explains: "Through the sin of our first parent, his descendants are deprived of grace, and the powers of the soul are left in a manner weakened and disordered, which weakening is called a wounding of nature." The Council of Trent confirms that while free will was "weakened and bent" by the fall, it was "not destroyed." This means we retain genuine freedom to choose -- but the choice is made in the context of disordered appetites that pull us constantly toward vice. The bad dog has a head start, so to speak. It has been fed by the inherited wound of original sin, by our own past choices, and by the culture that surrounds us.
But the good dog has an infinitely more powerful food source: grace. As St. Augustine prayed: "Give what Thou commandest, and command what Thou wilt." God does not merely command virtue and leave us to our own devices. The Council of Trent declares: "God does not command impossibilities, but by commanding admonishes thee to do what thou canst, and to pray for what thou canst not, and aids thee that thou mayest be able." Every act of grace-filled virtue strengthens the good dog. Every sacrament -- especially the Eucharist and Confession -- pours divine life into the soul, nourishing the virtuous tendencies and starving the vicious ones.
St. John of the Cross develops this teaching with rigorous precision in the Ascent of Mount Carmel. He distinguishes between the appetites themselves -- which are natural movements of desire -- and disordered attachments, which are appetites that have escaped the governance of reason and grace. Hunger is natural and good; gluttony is hunger disordered. The desire for rest is natural and good; sloth is rest disordered. The desire for friendship is natural and good; possessiveness and people-pleasing are friendship disordered. The question is never whether you have appetites but whether your appetites are ordered toward God or turned inward upon yourself.
The practical power of the two-dogs parable lies in its honesty about the incremental nature of both virtue and vice. Virtue is not built in a day. Vice is not conquered in a moment. Both grow through repetition. Aquinas teaches that virtues are stable dispositions of the soul acquired through repeated good acts cooperating with grace, while vices are stable dispositions acquired through repeated evil acts. Each feeding strengthens the corresponding dog. This means that the small choices matter enormously. Choosing to pray when you would rather scroll your phone feeds the good dog. Choosing comfort over duty feeds the bad dog. Neither choice seems dramatic in the moment, but over months and years, the cumulative effect is decisive.
The Church Fathers understood this well. St. Augustine writes: "He who made thee without thee, will not justify thee without thee." Grace is essential, but cooperation with grace is also essential. You must choose which dog to feed. The Council of Trent affirms: "The justified person is not assured of final perseverance without a special privilege of God." There is no point at which you can stop feeding the good dog and expect it to remain strong. The spiritual life requires ongoing, daily cooperation with grace -- an unceasing series of choices to feed virtue rather than vice.
St. Francis de Sales offers encouragement for those who find the battle discouraging. He counsels patience with oneself and persistence in small efforts. "Do not lose courage in considering your own imperfections," he writes, "but instantly set about remedying them -- every day begin the task anew." The parable of the two dogs is not meant to terrify but to clarify. Once you understand the dynamic, you can make deliberate choices. You can identify which dog you have been feeding and redirect your daily habits accordingly.
The sacramental life is the primary nourishment for the good dog. Frequent Confession starves the bad dog by cutting off the supply lines of unrepented sin and bringing hidden struggles into the light. The Eucharist feeds the good dog with the very life of Christ -- the most powerful nourishment available to the soul. Daily prayer, the Examen, spiritual reading, and acts of charity all strengthen virtue. Conversely, habitual indulgence of disordered appetites -- even in small matters -- gradually strengthens vice until it becomes deeply ingrained. As Scripture warns: "Wherefore he that thinketh himself to stand, let him take heed lest he fall." And again: "With fear and trembling work out your salvation." The language of vigilance is not accidental -- it reflects the reality that the battle is ongoing and the stakes are eternal.
St. Teresa of Avila, in her description of the early mansions of the Interior Castle, paints a vivid picture of the soul that has not yet learned to discipline its appetites. She describes a soul surrounded by "reptiles and other creatures" -- the disordered attachments and habitual vices that swarm around the person who has not yet begun the work of mortification. The two-dogs parable speaks to exactly this condition: the bad dog is surrounded by allies, and the good dog is outnumbered until grace tips the balance. Teresa's counsel is the same as Lillis's: begin with awareness, proceed with grace, and trust that God provides what you cannot supply on your own.
The question Dr. Lillis asks is deceptively simple but profoundly searching: "Which dog are you feeding?" The honest answer to that question, on any given day, reveals more about your spiritual state than hours of abstract reflection. Answer it honestly today, and you have taken the first step toward feeding the right one. And remember: you do not feed the good dog alone. Christ feeds it with you, in you, and through every grace He offers.
Dr. Anthony Lillis uses the parable of two dogs fighting inside you: one represents virtue and one represents vice. "Which one wins? The one you feed." Every choice to indulge a disordered appetite feeds the bad dog; every choice for virtue feeds the good one. Your appetites (desires for comfort, pleasure, approval, control) are not evil in themselves — but they must be ordered toward God or they become chains. (Ep 643)
Doctrinal Foundation
T2.O.006 (sententia_certa): The consequences of original sin in each person include a darkened intellect, a weakened will inclined to evil, disordered concupiscence, subjection to suffering and bodily death, and a general diminishment of the natural powers — though free will itself is not destroyed.
- Aquinas: Through the sin of our first parent, his descendants are deprived of grace, and the powers of the soul are left in a manner weakened and disordered, which weakening is called a wounding of nature.
- Councils: If anyone says that since Adam's sin the free will of man is lost and extinguished... let him be anathema.
- Fathers: By the greatness of the first transgression, our nature had fallen and deteriorated, and was changed for the worse... Not that free will was altogether taken away, but that it was weakened and bent.
T4.G.005 (De fide (defined dogma)): The grace of justification can be lost through mortal sin. The justified person is not assured of final perseverance without a special privilege of God.
- Scripture: Wherefore he that thinketh himself to stand, let him take heed lest he fall.
Aquinas: Free-will does not suffice for the act of turning to God without the habitual gift of grace. But after grace is received, the act of perseverance still needs the help of grace.
Fathers: He who made thee without thee, will not justify thee without thee.
T4.G.007 (De fide (defined dogma)): God gives sufficient grace to all the just for the observance of the divine commandments. God does not command the impossible, but by commanding admonishes us to do what we can and to pray for what we cannot.
- Scripture: God is faithful, who will not suffer you to be tempted above that which you are able: but will make also with temptation issue, that you may be able to bear it.
- Aquinas: To him who does what is in him, God does not deny grace.
- Councils: God does not command impossibilities, but by commanding admonishes thee to do what thou canst, and to pray for what thou canst not, and aids thee that thou mayest be able.
- Fathers: Give what Thou commandest, and command what Thou wilt.
Dr. Anthony Lillis uses the parable of two dogs fighting inside you: one represents virtue and one represents vice. "Which one wins? The one you feed." Every choice to indulge a disordered appetite feeds the bad dog; every choice for virtue feeds the good one. Your appetites (desires for comfort, pleasure, approval, control) are not evil in themselves — but they must be ordered toward God or they become chains. (Ep 643)
Doctrinal Foundation
T2.O.006 (sententia_certa): The consequences of original sin in each person include a darkened intellect, a weakened will inclined to evil, disordered concupiscence, subjection to suffering and bodily death, and a general diminishment of the natural powers — though free will itself is not destroyed.
- Aquinas: Through the sin of our first parent, his descendants are deprived of grace, and the powers of the soul are left in a manner weakened and disordered, which weakening is called a wounding of nature.
- Councils: If anyone says that since Adam's sin the free will of man is lost and extinguished... let him be anathema.
- Fathers: By the greatness of the first transgression, our nature had fallen and deteriorated, and was changed for the worse... Not that free will was altogether taken away, but that it was weakened and bent.
T4.G.005 (De fide (defined dogma)): The grace of justification can be lost through mortal sin. The justified person is not assured of final perseverance without a special privilege of God.
- Scripture: Wherefore he that thinketh himself to stand, let him take heed lest he fall.
Aquinas: Free-will does not suffice for the act of turning to God without the habitual gift of grace. But after grace is received, the act of perseverance still needs the help of grace.
Fathers: He who made thee without thee, will not justify thee without thee.
T4.G.007 (De fide (defined dogma)): God gives sufficient grace to all the just for the observance of the divine commandments. God does not command the impossible, but by commanding admonishes us to do what we can and to pray for what we cannot.
- Scripture: God is faithful, who will not suffer you to be tempted above that which you are able: but will make also with temptation issue, that you may be able to bear it.
- Aquinas: To him who does what is in him, God does not deny grace.
- Councils: God does not command impossibilities, but by commanding admonishes thee to do what thou canst, and to pray for what thou canst not, and aids thee that thou mayest be able.
- Fathers: Give what Thou commandest, and command what Thou wilt.
Extended Doctrinal Analysis
T4.G.016 (De fide (defined dogma)): Without a special divine revelation, no one can know with the certainty of faith whether he is in a state of sanctifying grace. A moral certitude grounded in signs of the spiritual life is possible, but absolute certitude of faith is not.
T4.G.025 (De fide (defined dogma)): The virtue of charity can be lost through mortal sin. When charity is lost, sanctifying grace is also lost, since charity is the form of grace. However, faith and hope may remain even after the loss of charity, unless they too are destroyed by sins directly opposed to them.
T4.G.034 (De fide (defined dogma)): The gift of final perseverance — the grace to die in the state of sanctifying grace — cannot be strictly merited but must be obtained by prayer. It is a great and special gift of God, and the Council of Trent teaches that the justified should place their firmest hope in God's help.
T4.S.030 (De fide (defined dogma)): Christ instituted the Sacrament of Penance for the reconciliation of the faithful who have fallen into sin after Baptism. Sacramental confession of mortal sins is necessary for salvation by divine law for all who have fallen after Baptism.
T4.S.031 (De fide (defined dogma)): The acts of the penitent — contrition, confession, and satisfaction — are the quasi-matter of the Sacrament of Penance. Perfect contrition, arising from the love of God, reconciles the sinner to God even before the actual reception of the sacrament, provided it includes the desire to confess.
T4.S.032 (De fide (defined dogma)): The minister of the Sacrament of Penance is a priest who holds jurisdiction (faculties) from the Church. No deacon or layperson can validly absolve sins.
T4.S.033 (De fide (defined dogma)): The absolution given by the priest in the Sacrament of Penance is a true judicial act, not merely a declaration or announcement that sins have been forgiven. The priest acts as judge, with the power to bind and to loose.
T4.S.034 (De fide (defined dogma)): The confession of all mortal sins according to their species and number, so far as they are remembered after diligent examination of conscience, is required by divine law and is necessary for salvation.
T4.S.035 (De fide (defined dogma)): Attrition — imperfect contrition arising from a consideration of the ugliness of sin or from the fear of hell and punishment — is a true and profitable sorrow. It suffices for the valid reception of the Sacrament of Penance, provided it excludes the will to sin and includes the hope of forgiveness.
T4.S.036 (sententia_certa): The sacramental seal of confession (sigillum confessionis) is inviolable. The priest may never, for any reason whatsoever, reveal anything that a penitent has confessed to him, whether by word, sign, or in any other manner.
T4.S.037 (De fide (defined dogma)): Satisfaction — the penance imposed by the confessor — is a true part of the Sacrament of Penance. Through works of satisfaction (prayer, fasting, almsgiving, and other pious works), the temporal punishment due to sins already forgiven as to guilt is remitted in whole or in part.
T4.S.038 (De fide (defined dogma)): The Church possesses the power to grant indulgences — a remission before God of the temporal punishment due to sins already forgiven as to their guilt. This power was granted by Christ and has been exercised by the Church from the earliest times. Indulgences draw upon the treasury of merit of Christ and the saints.
T4.S.039 (sententia_certa): The Sacrament of Penance can be received repeatedly and as often as a Christian falls into sin. Unlike the sacraments that imprint a character, Penance imposes no limit on the number of times it may be received, and the faithful are encouraged to confess frequently.
T4.S.091 (De fide (defined dogma)): An unworthy reception of the Eucharist — that is, receiving Holy Communion in the state of mortal sin with knowledge and deliberation — is a grave sacrilege. The communicant eats and drinks judgement to himself by failing to discern the Body of the Lord.